|
|
 |
The General Aviation Airspace Infringements Website |
|
|
Welcome to Fly On Track Radar Replay #2
Stansted CTA
|
|
|
You can view a real radar replay of an infringement
here if you have Windows Media player.... but before you do, read the following to understand
what you are seeing.... a classic example of what can happen when G.A. pilots could use
Mode C on their transponders but then don't bother in practice. Mode C gives a controller an indication of your altitude (through conversion from
the flight level transmitted). If they see your aircraft without Mode C in a position where you could
be BELOW controlled airspace, the controller has to assume you know what you are doing (well, you have been
trained properly haven't you?), and that you do know where you are (because you have
not told anyone that you do not!), and therefore, the instructions given to aircraft within controlled airspace have to
assume that you ARE below that airspace and out of the way.
|
|
|
This month we look at an incident in 'overhanging' controlled airspace,
where a 'CTA' extends out at altitude beyond a CTR. This situation happens with most of our provincial airports, and
allows G.A. traffic quite legally to pass UNDER the CTA 'shelf'.
In this case, the airspace in question is North East of Stansted,
and comes down
to 1500' above sea level. This particular block above 1500' is used to
manoeuvre instrument traffic onto the ILS for runway 23 at Stansted. The
Stansted traffic
doesn't need to be below 1500' this far out, but has to be down to something like 2000' to give a normal descent on the
ILS once it gets closer and enters the CTR. Hence the airspace below the CTA is Class G, to allow G.A. traffic unrestricted access below
the level that any Stansted instrument traffic will operate. The fact that this is Stansted is not important, this situation
of controlled airspace above, free airspace below, exists in many parts of the country.
|
|
|
You will see an aircraft being manoeuvred round to the ILS into Stansted. Very soon
after the playback starts, it will be briefly highlighted for you with a blue label, and it's squawking 1035.
Below the Squawk is the 'SS' to show the aircraft is inbound
to Stansted (EGSS) and there are two further figures. The green figure (initially '41') shows the current altitude
in 100s of feet, so the '41' means 4100'. The orange/brown number
(initially '40', then '30' then quickly '20')
shows the altitude that
the aircraft is cleared down to level off (if no further descent is given). So the '40'
means cleared down to 4000' and eventually the '20' means cleared
down to 2000'. At the very start you will see a radar track very close by heading North
West, but ignore it, this is very high level traffic way above and the 'squawk detail' has been removed so not to obscure the Stansted traffic here.
|
|
|
A few seconds into the replay, you will see a '7000' squawk heading towards Stansted, briefly highlighted for you in RED,
but as the Mode C is not switched on, as you will see from the three dashes --- where the level
should be. The orange/brown NMS shows 'No Mode S' information available, but in fact,
it is the lack of 'Mode C' which is important here.
In fact, the pilot of this aircraft is 'unsure of position' but hasn't
told anyone (yet). The controller therefore takes the '7000' squawker (which has not at this stage
declared he is lost) as being UNDER 1500'. So in other words, you have the benefit of hindsight, there is nothing to tell
the controller there may be a problem here at the moment. The altitude of the infringer is given at the bottom of this script,
but why not try it first without knowing?
|
|
|
The Stansted runway is where the ILS approach line ends. The markers on the ILS approach line are
2 nm apart. Play the replay a couple of times trying to
ignore the hindsight, and also, whilst you are at it, work out what altitude
you do NOT want the 7000 'squawker' to be at. You may need to replay the sequence more than once and of course, pause it.
When you've decided you want to know the altitude of the 7000 squawker, there's a link at the bottom of the page to
reveal the answer. Then replay everything again with that knowledge. On the other hand, you can probably guess what altitude
the 7000 is at. We know, because the pilot finally declared to another unit he was unsure of position, and reported his
altitude.
|
|
| Click on the image on the left to
launch the radar clip. It is currently only available in 'wmv' format, therefore Windows Media Player should be used.
Many thanks to all at NATS who have gone out of their way to make the public viewing of this clip possible.
A different infringement and analysis will appear every few weeks - until they stop! When you have played it a couple of times
and want to know the altitude of the infringer and 'lessons learned', click here.
|
Radar Replay Library
| Link |
Description |
| Latest: Manchester Corridor into CTR (#7)
|
The latest radar replay (#7) shows an aircraft starting in the Manchester Low Level Corridor then
infringing the CTR with the controllers breaking off approaches ahead of it.
|
| Latest: Stansted CTR (#6)
|
The latest radar replay (#6) shows a small aircraft slowly transiting Stansted CTR.
|
| Compton VOR (#5)
|
Radar replay (#5) shows an aircraft not noticing the lowered airspace ahead near Compton VOR
and breaking in at altitude.
|
| Luton (#4)
|
Radar replay (#4) shows a student lost and crossing the Luton CTR and extended runway
centre line.
|
| Gatwick/LTMA (#3)
|
This radar replay (#3) shows disruption caused by a short infringement into a layer of the
LTMA over Sussex, eventually descending to the correct altitude but not early enough.
|
| Stansted CTA (#2)
|
This radar replay (#2) shows a problem caused by a pilot NOT squawking Mode C and then getting lost
eventually turning up close to the extended centreline of Stansted in the CTA. Due to the lack of Mode C
the controller didn't know he was in the CTA.
|
| Heathrow CTR (#1)
|
The original radar replay (#1) shows the disruption caused when a pilot makes a navigation mistake
and enters the Heathrow CTR and heads down towards final approach without realising it (at first!)
|
Donations!
|
Remember: GASCo who run this site is a CHARITY depending on grants and
donations to run and develop ideas. You can make a contribution to support GASCo online - using 'plastic' or Paypal - whether it is a
straight donation, or simply a social event that you have held which has made a small 'profit' on charging which
needs to be disposed of,
GASCo would be grateful to receive it. Click on the smilie on the left
|
Whilst you're here, visit HOT NEWS (home page),
explore Tips/Links, or see latest Infringement Stats.Any questions or observations? - see
the "Your Say" forum - NATS and the CAA monitor it Access to other pages via the tabs
at the top
Remember: GASCo who run this site is a CHARITY depending on grants and
donations to run and develop ideas. You can make a contribution to support GASCo online -
see the tab at the top of the page to do so, or click here.
Whilst you're here, visit HOT NEWS (home page),
explore Tips/Links, or see latest Infringement Stats.Any questions or observations? - see
the "Your Say" forum - NATS and the CAA monitor it Access to other pages via the tabs
at the top
|